Teardown Shows iPhone Camera Could Fit Inside iPod Touch

nano_teardown

A teardown of the new nano throws some light on the two big questions raised by Apple’s new iPod line: Why doesn’t the iPod touch have a camera, and why can’t the iPod nano take still pictures? The teardown by iFixit reveals that a camera would have fit in the iPod touch, but it would be a very tight squeeze.

The iPod touch measures 8.5 mm thick and the iPhone’s auto-focus camera measures 6 mm, giving just 2.5 mm of extra room. By comparison, the iPhone measures 12.3 mm thick, which gives it 6.3 mm of extra wiggle room.

“Unlike the Nano, the iPod Touch could conceivably support an iPhone-sized camera, although it would certainly be an engineering challenge,” said Kyle Wiens, CEO of iFixIt.

The ability of the iPhone’s camera to fit inside the iPod touch calls into question statements made by Steve Jobs after Wednesday’s product event. The exclusion of a camera was primarily for reasons of product differentiation, Jobs told the New York Times.

Prior to the event, an unsourced report said iPods with cameras were being delayed because of technical issues. And now AppleInsider is reporting that the camera was kept out because it wasn’t up to quality. Apple will be adding it as soon as the bad part is fixed, AI says.

The exclusion of a camera in the touch is a real puzzle because there was more evidence than normal to support the rumor. Pictures of prototypes were published, and dozens of case manufacturers were leaked the specs of the camera, which was put in a new position — the center of the back, rather than being offset like the iPhone before it.

The question about the inability of the iPod nano to take still pictures is easier to answer. The iFixit teardown reveals that the the iPod nano is only 6.2 mm thick, leaving no room for the iPhone’s 6 mm camera. When the iPhone camera’s rubber mount is also included, the component is thicker than the entire iPod nano. By comparison, the nano’s VGA (640 x 480) camera is only 2.75 mm thick.

DON'T MISS
iPod Touch Teardown Reveals Empty Space For Camera

Jobs made a plain statement about this one to the NYT. “The sensors for doing video are fairly thin,” he told the Times. “The sensors for doing a still camera, at much higher pixel resolution — and we’d really like to have autofocus — they are just way too thick to ever fit inside the Nano.”

nano_camera

About the author

Leander Kahney

is the editor and publisher of Cult of Mac, and author of three books about technology culture: Inside Steve’s Brain, the New York Times bestseller about Steve Jobs; Cult of Mac; and Cult of iPod. Leander has written for Wired, MacWeek, Scientific American, and The Guardian in London. Follow Leander on Twitter @lkahney and Facebook.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Apple, iPod Touch, News |

  • Aaron

    “camera would have fitted in the iPod touch”
    Should be “Would Have Fit”

  • Elizabeth

    Were your brain Just a tiny bit bigger, it would have fitted the liberating notion that perhaps not every English speaking country in the world writes English the American way… especially the birthplace of English itself… :)

  • http://www.we-rate-stuff.com brad

    Jobs already said the reason they didn’t put the camera in the iPod touch is to make it as cheap and accessible as possible. In fact, I was pretty sure I read that on this website.

  • GR

    “So what we were focused on is just reducing the price to $199. We don’t need to add new stuff — we need to get the price down where everyone can afford it.” – Steve Jobs, NY Times Interview

    Which part of this isn’t clear? If Apple had wanted a camera in the Touch they would have added it. I don’t believe anything about this being a technical challenge. This was a product marketing decision pure and simple. They are prioritizing price, and market penetration, over adding extra gizmos. Period.

  • K

    but why is’nt the new nano able to take still pictures?!?