Apple Drops Promo Codes for 17+ Rated Apps

Some perverted unfiltered online content. No wait, it's the Apple website! And in an app that enables access to unfiltered content, but doesn't have to worry about review copies and 17+ ratings. Because Apple's hypocritical like that.

Some perverted unfiltered online content. No wait, it's the Apple website! And in an app that enables access to unfiltered content, but doesn't have to worry about review copies and 17+ ratings: Safari. Because Apple's hypocritical like that.

Apple recently announced that 1.5 billion apps have been downloaded from the App Store. With the dodgy approvals process alienating developers, you’d sometimes think Apple reckons it got where it did alone, without the people actually making the apps. Now, the company’s gone one step further, cleverly shooting itself in the foot (and developers in the face), thereby trying everything it can think of to screw up its lead and give the competition a sporting chance.

After all, surely Apple wouldn’t be quite so stupid as to ban all promo codes for 17+ rated apps? But that’s the story on TUAW, punching in the gut an already broken system (given that Apple has yet to provide non-US App Store account holders with an official means of redeeming promo codes). (See also: Q & A: How Sex Game Apps Get Approved By Apple)

You might think “so what?”, since, clearly, the only things rated 17+ would be dodgy ‘porn’ apps, right? Well, no. As we reported, Eucalyptus—an eReader for Project Gutenberg content—was saddled with a 17+ rating recently, due to it supposedly allowing ‘unfiltered internet content’. (In practise, Apple was seemingly miffed at the app enabling access to the text from Kamasutra, despite, say, Safari enabling access to hard-core pornography websites.) This means the 17+ rating is likely to affect some or all updates for all web-oriented software—Twitter clients, web browsers, IM clients, Flickr clients, eBook readers, RSS readers and so on.

Promo codes don’t generally affect the public. Although they’re sometimes given away by developers, they’re usually used by writers and journalists as review copies. Without promo codes, 17+ apps run the risk of not getting mainstream coverage, meaning they’re far less likely to ‘break through’ and become a sales success. (Contrary to what you might think, most publications don’t in fact have a ‘budget’ for writers to buy software, and many outlets enforce a policy of strictly not paying for review copies. When you’re reviewing hundreds of apps, those dollarpoundeuros stack up pretty fast.)

DON'T MISS
Apple Relents, Issues Promo Codes for +17 Apps on iTunes

Here’s hoping Apple has a change of heart, because the App Store already has enough problems, without Apple making things worse, not only for developers and reviewers, but for users (who won’t find out about great new 17+ apps) and themselves (since sales will be lower).

About the author

Craig Grannell

Craig Grannell is Cult of Mac's designer and an occasional contributor. He also runs iPhoneTiny.com, a Twitter-driven reviews site for iPhone apps and games. Follow Craig on Twitter @CraigGrannell and visit his website, Snub Communications.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in iPhone, News |

  • http://www.guldfors.com Gfors

    “Because Apple’s hypocritical like that”, oh please, this is getting so old. The people who make the stupid comparison of the Appstore and Safari are just desperately grasping after controversy.

    Apple isn´t associated with *the entire web*, the Appstore however is Apples “product”, OF COURSE they´re gonna ban content that Apple doesnt want to be associated with.

    STOP COMPARING APPSTORE CONTENT WITH SAFARI AND THE WEB, you´re just making yourself look like an idiot…

  • http://www.snubcommunications.com Craig Grannell

    @Gfors: I’m not “comparing App Store content with Safari and the web” – I’m comparing the content apps can access and calling Apple’s hypocrisy on it.

    If Apple wants to be some kind of perverse guardian, that’s fine. But when it slaps 17+ ratings on an eReader that can only read text from Project Gutenberg, when Safari can access all that content and plenty more, that’s just crazy. And when every single web-facing app will now possibly be stuck with a 17+ rating AND no means of the authors to send promos for press review, that’s disgraceful.

    If Apple was clamping down on hardcore porn apps, fine. And if they were anti-promos for apps where they couldn’t guarantee the recipient wasn’t ‘over age’ for the content, I’m sort of OK with that. But Twitter clients? Flickr clients? Web browsers? It’s just utter bollocks from a company that should know better.

  • TC

    Wow, Cult of Mac. Bitter much about not getting a pre-release 3GS? Seems like between Craig and Leander, this blog should be renamed Cult of iPhone Haters.

    Guess people will have to just download one of those other 65,000+ apps and leave Project Gutenberg to any of a thousand web-based readers. (Said with tear rolling down face.)

    • http://www.snubcommunications.com Craig Grannell

      Yeah. Because I write about things that are very, very wrong with the App Store, I clearly hate it. That explains all the hugely positive stuff I’ve written here and elsewhere about the platform.

      What I’m writing about here doesn’t unduly affect me. If I can’t get a promo, I’ll just write about something else. The people it affects badly are the independent developers who are the lifeblood of the platform. Without them, the App Store is nothing. I’ve already had reports from some devs having to turn down review requests from publications, because their 17+ apps (such ‘shocking’ things as—gasp!—Twitter clients and eReaders) no longer have promo codes assigned. And this will likely soon be the case with ALL web-facing apps. Saddling an RSS reader with a 17+ rating (and all the associated warnings and crap on the app’s App Store page) is just ludicrous in the extreme.

      But, hey, if you want to paint my concern for indie devs as some kind of bitching about not getting a pre-release 3GS that I never asked for anyway, feel free.

  • phil

    You guys wrote a pretty good interview with a developer yesterday on this exact subject. I’m surprised how candid he was about his “fixed” sex dice and the troubles it caused.

    For those who havent seen it:
    http://cultofmac.com/q-a-how-sex-game-apps-get-approved-by-apple

  • http://www.promotionalcodes4u.co.uk promotional codes

    I think Apple it the best brand in the world,and I think that it is a good news for its customers that it released voucher codes.So keep going and increase your sell Apple.

  • http://www.promotionalcodes4u.co.uk promotional codes

    I think Apple it the best brand in the world,and I think that it is a good news for its customers that it released voucher codes.So keep going and increase your sell Apple.