Top stories

A New Kind Of Heist: Six Apps For Free

Those crazy MacHeisters are at it again, and this time the deal is even harder to resist.
The first ever MacHeist Nano won’t cost you a penny. You can download, without charge, fully licensed copies of ShoveBox, WriteRoom, Twitterific, TinyGrab, and Hordes of Orcs. If 500,000 people take part (which I think is a pretty safe [...]

Getting More iPhone Home Screens – And Keeping Them

A couple of weeks back, I wrote Temporarily Get More iPhone Home Screens Via Cunning Bug Exploit, but had heard staying away from the iTunes Applications tab within my iPhone was probably a Very Good Idea. Reader Larry Pressnell noted that since the most recent iTunes update, his extra screens have been accessible in iTunes.
Since [...]

Cult of Mac Favorite: MobileStacks Is the Best Reason To Jailbreak. Period.

I really like Stacks on my Mac. Stacks makes it fast and easy to find files, folders and apps right from the Dock. It makes managing a Mac pretty slick with all sorts of little UI tricks. That’s why I recently gave MobileStack a go on my jailbroken iPhone.
I must say that it lives up to the [...]

Gallery: Behind the Scenes From Two Classic Apple TV Ads

Is this Steve Jobs driving a tank in a classic Apple TV spot from the late 1990s? That was the rumor at the time: Jobs was making cameos in Apple commercials.
Ken Segall, the TBWA ad man responsible for naming the iMac and Think Different, reveals the truth after the jump. He also shares some rare [...]

$1,000 iPhone App No More; Mourning “I Am Rich”

Richred1

Ladies and gentlemen of the Cult, I bring you bad news: As of 2:18 p.m. Pacific yesterday, I Am Rich is no longer available from the iPhone AppStore. At the behest of VentureBeat and many other bloggers, Apple has yanked a brand new app in the prime of life. Yes, I know. It’s tragic. Never again will you get to spend $1,000 NOW JUST $999.99!!1! for an utterly useless program that just displays a red gem to flaunt your wealth to passersby.

Now, I Am Rich was obviously intended by author Armin Heinrich to be either a joke or a piece of art, and it wasn’t particularly successful as either. It’s sort of one-note, you know? But its removal actually reflects an extremely obnoxious habit that Apple has had as of late: they’ve been pulling apps, including the extremely popular NetShare and Box Office, neither of which appears to violates Apple’s SDK (not that anyone knows, thanks to the blanket NDA…)

Jason Kottke puts it well:

Excluding I Am Rich would be excluding for taste…because some feel that it costs too much for what it does. (And this isn’t the only example. There have been many cries of too many poor quality (but otherwise functional) apps in the store and that Apple should address the problem.) App Store shoppers should get to make the choice of whether or not to buy an iPhone app, not Apple, particularly since the App Store is the only way to legitimately purchase consumer iPhone apps. Imagine if Apple chose which music they stocked in the iTunes store based on the company’s taste. No Kanye because Jay-Z is better. No Dylan because it’s too whiney. Of course they don’t do that; they stock a crapload of different music and let the buyer decide. We should deride Apple for that type of behavior, not cheering them on.

Hear, hear!

Technorati Tags: , ,

About the author

Petemortensen

Pete Mortensen is the communications lead for growth strategy firm Jump Associates and the co-author of Wired to Care: How Companies Prosper When They Create Widespread Empathy, a book and blog that are significantly more interesting than you might initially think. Pete's particular Apple avocations are both around design--interface and industrial. Follow him on Twitter!

Email the author | Read more posts by Pete Mortensen.

10 comments

    [...] iPhone apps, it has removed what has been perhaps its most controversial application so far, Cult of Mac points out. Maybe the company read some of the criticism on this site and others, or maybe it just realized [...]

    My only problem with I Am Rich was my fear that I could have accidentally purchased it. My daughter has a Touch and was using my iTunes account to download all the free apps she could. It would have been really bad if she’d purchased I Am Rich in a frenzy of downloading. Otherwise, I thought it was pretty funny that Apple let that one through but withdrew Box Office.

    What would stop someone from using the same (or really really close) graphics and icons and putting a FREE app out there called I Am Smart? That would be the immediate end of I Am Rich, and make the dopes who had bought it feel really (REALLY!) dumb.

    I don’t have that many, but I know several people who have accidentally purchased applications. Realistically, this might be as much a flaw in Apple’s store function, but if/until that gets worked out, in the mean time apps like this shouldn’t exist (and shouldn’t have been let into the app store in the first place).

    Plus if anyone disputes the charge on an item like this, Apple could get stuck eating a pretty big error.

    I think Apple should fully have the right to decide what gets sold on their platform…it’s THEIR platform. It would be nice, however, for them to, perhaps, pre-screen apps so consumers like us don’t get upset when they pull cool apps…we just won’t know they exist through an authorized channel…there’s always the jailbreak option, right?

    So I am Rich is too expensive for what it does and therefore it is illegal to sell according to Apple. Man, I know lots of folks who feel that Photoshop CS3 is way too expensive – is it legal to pirate it then?

    [...] tiesiogine ta žodžio prasme, tapo App Store aplikacija už $999. Kaip jau žinai – paÅ¡alinta iÅ¡ App Store. Taip pat jau žinai, kad buvo iÅ¡ viso net gi 8 geni[j]ai, kurie nupirko Å¡iÄ… aplikacijÄ…: 6 [...]

    [...] a “secret” mantra: “I am richI deserv itI am rich,healthy &successful.”Cult Of Mac mourns the loss of the app from the app store. 3 other apps have also been pulled from the store recently with no [...]

    [...] se “hlupáci” jako Debbie Norom chystají obchodovat na Ebayi. Kauza má samozÃ…â„¢ejmÄ› i druhou rovinu. NemÄ›l by Apple nechat na zákaznících, za co své peníze utratí? Zvlášte když jediným [...]